In the wake of the recent French elections, the anticipated reshaping of the political landscape has failed to materialize, leaving France at a crossroads that is as culturally fragmented as it is politically tumultuous. The current state of French politics extends beyond mere partisan maneuvering; it reflects deeper, unresolved questions about national identity, social cohesion and the role of immigration in shaping the nation’s future.

For over three decades, France has grappled with complex issues surrounding immigration and national identity. This struggle, which began in earnest in the late 1980s, has evolved from concerns centered around ethnic diversity to a more polarized debate focused on religious identity. The banning of headscarves in public schools and other measures targeting visible religious symbols have underscored a broader societal discomfort with integrating diverse communities. This tension is not merely a backdrop for political discourse but a central element that has shaped the nation’s cultural and social policies.

The far-right in France has exploited these divisions to further their agenda, painting a broad and damaging portrait of Muslim communities as a threat to national cohesion. Despite the fact that many Muslims in France are well-integrated, peaceful citizens facing economic hardships akin to those of their non-Muslim counterparts, the far-right’s rhetoric persists. This rhetoric not only distorts the reality of these individuals’ lives but also serves to deepen the societal rifts that many would prefer to heal.

In the most recent elections, the far-right’s influence was evident from the outset. Their initial success in the first round was a stark indicator of their political clout. Jubilant supporters and a surge of votes underscored the far-right's significant presence in French politics, even though they ultimately did not prevail in the final round. This early victory for the far-right was a troubling signal of their enduring relevance and the challenges facing mainstream parties in addressing their concerns.

President Emmanuel Macron, in a bid to project an image of unity and peace, called for an "Olympic Truce" in the lead-up to the Paris Olympics. This call was intended to transcend political divides and foster a spirit of harmony during the international event. Yet, Macron’s efforts to promote peace were marred by a series of diplomatic blunders. Notably, his administration’s handling of the contentious issue of Western Sahara strained relations with Algeria, adding another layer of complexity to France’s already fraught diplomatic landscape.

The domestic political situation is equally fraught. Macron’s agenda, which sought to overhaul traditional political structures, appears to be faltering. The political impasse facing France is compounded by the fact that Macron is unable to dissolve the newly elected National Assembly until June 9, 2025. This restriction effectively prevents him from calling for new parliamentary elections before then, leaving the country in a prolonged period of political uncertainty.

Macron’s presidency can be likened to a political triathlon, where endurance and strategy are essential. His attempts to dismantle conventional political structures, challenging both the right and left, reflect a bold – though increasingly controversial – approach. His brand of authoritarian liberalism, characterized by a blend of ambitious reform and an often abrasive style, has created a political environment that mirrors the cutthroat tactics of Frank Underwood, the protagonist of the American series "House of Cards." Underwood’s famous dictum, "If you don’t like how the table is set, turn over the table," resonates with Macron’s approach to governance, which emphasizes disruption and bold moves over traditional consensus-building.

Yet, this strategy has not come without its costs. Macron’s governing style has alienated both allies and adversaries, leading to a political landscape that is increasingly polarized and unstable. The broader implications of Macron’s approach are significant: the potential for institutional deadlock and ongoing social unrest could undermine France’s ability to address pressing issues such as economic inequality, social integration and international diplomacy.

As France navigates this challenging period, its future remains uncertain. The country stands at a pivotal moment, where the decisions made by its leaders will have far-reaching consequences. Macron’s approach to politics, characterized by a willingness to upend established norms and confront difficult issues head-on, could either serve as a catalyst for much-needed reform or exacerbate the divisions that have long plagued French society.

In this context, the question of what’s wrong with France is not merely an inquiry into the current state of its politics but a broader reflection on the country’s identity and its capacity to adapt to an evolving global landscape. The path forward will require not only political endurance but also a willingness to engage in meaningful dialogue and address the deep-seated issues that continue to shape French society. The choices made in this critical juncture will define France’s trajectory for years to come, highlighting the need for thoughtful leadership and a commitment to addressing the complex challenges facing the nation.